The idea of Bitcoin entering a prolonged supercycle has been one of the most powerful narratives circulating in the cryptocurrency market over the past year. The concept suggests that Bitcoin could experience an extended multi-year bull run without the traditional deep corrections that have historically defined its price cycles. However, recent comments from former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao have introduced a sharp dose of realism into this optimistic outlook.
Just weeks after expressing strong confidence that Bitcoin was on the verge of breaking free from its four-year cycle pattern, CZ acknowledged that he is no longer certain such a scenario will unfold. Speaking during a weekend AMA session, he explained that intensifying market fear, widespread misinformation, and rising macroeconomic uncertainty have significantly weakened his conviction.
This shift in tone followed a dramatic downturn in Bitcoin’s price, which fell to around 75,000 dollars and triggered massive liquidations across derivatives markets. Nearly 2.5 billion dollars in leveraged positions were wiped out in a short period of time, reinforcing how fragile sentiment has become.
CZ’s reversal does not mean he has abandoned the long-term bullish case for Bitcoin. Instead, it highlights how unpredictable global conditions have become and how difficult it is to confidently forecast extended market behavior, even for seasoned industry leaders.
Why CZ Originally Believed in a Bitcoin Supercycle
Changpeng Zhao’s initial supercycle thesis was rooted in the belief that structural changes were taking place within the global financial system and regulatory landscape. He argued that cryptocurrency, and Bitcoin in particular, was transitioning from a speculative asset class into a recognized component of mainstream finance.
During an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, CZ pointed to increasingly favorable regulatory attitudes in the United States as a key catalyst. He suggested that clearer rules and a more supportive political environment would unlock a wave of institutional capital large enough to fundamentally alter Bitcoin’s historical price behavior.
According to this perspective, once major banks, asset managers, corporations, and sovereign entities feel comfortable allocating capital to Bitcoin, the traditional boom-and-bust cycle tied to halving events could lose relevance. Instead of experiencing sharp peaks followed by multi-year bear markets, Bitcoin might begin to resemble long-term store-of-value assets such as gold.
CZ believed this transformation could culminate around 2026, when regulatory clarity, infrastructure maturity, and institutional participation would converge. At the time, this outlook resonated with many investors who were eager to believe that crypto markets had finally matured beyond their volatile adolescence.
Understanding Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle
To appreciate why the supercycle narrative was so compelling, it is important to understand Bitcoin’s historical four-year cycle. This pattern is closely associated with Bitcoin halving events, which occur approximately every four years and cut the block reward miners receive in half.
These supply reductions have historically acted as powerful catalysts for price appreciation:
The 2012 halving preceded a rally from around 12 dollars to over 1,000 dollars.
The 2016 halving set the stage for Bitcoin’s surge to nearly 20,000 dollars in 2017.
The 2020 halving was followed by the 2021 bull market peak near 69,000 dollars.
Each cycle has followed a similar structure: accumulation, rapid expansion, euphoric peak, and prolonged correction. CZ’s supercycle thesis suggested that this pattern could be broken due to unprecedented institutional demand and regulatory acceptance.
However, breaking such a deeply entrenched historical structure would require extraordinary forces. The recent market downturn has raised questions about whether those forces are truly strong enough to override established dynamics.
What Triggered CZ’s Change in Outlook
The immediate catalyst for CZ’s shift in perspective was Bitcoin’s failure to hold key technical levels. After struggling near 82,500 dollars, the price slid rapidly through multiple support zones.
Bitcoin also fell below its 50-day exponential moving average near 75,500 dollars, a technical signal often associated with extended bearish momentum. More importantly, Bitcoin dipped below its realized price of approximately 80,700 dollars.
The realized price represents the average acquisition cost of all coins currently in circulation. When Bitcoin trades below this level, it implies that a majority of holders are sitting on unrealized losses. Historically, this condition has coincided with periods of heightened fear and capitulation.
Seeing Bitcoin breach these important thresholds while panic spread across social media forced CZ to reconsider his earlier confidence. In his own words, widespread FUD on Crypto Twitter has amplified market anxiety and accelerated selling pressure.
The Selloff Extended Beyond Crypto Markets
One of the most concerning aspects of the recent downturn is that it was not limited to digital assets. Traditional safe havens such as gold and silver also experienced sharp declines.
Gold fell roughly 9 percent to around 4,900 dollars per ounce, while silver plunged by approximately 26 percent to near 85 dollars. Combined losses across precious metals markets were estimated to exceed 10 trillion dollars.
This synchronized selloff across assets that typically behave differently suggests deeper systemic stress rather than a crypto-specific issue. When multiple asset classes decline simultaneously, it often indicates tightening financial conditions, rising liquidity constraints, or shifts in global capital flows.
CZ now attributes the broader market weakness to a combination of geopolitical tensions, macroeconomic instability, and social-media-driven panic.
Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Pressures
Escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly involving the United States and Iran, have driven investors toward the perceived safety of the U.S. dollar. A stronger dollar tends to weigh on risk assets, including stocks, commodities, and cryptocurrencies.
At the same time, persistent inflation and unpredictable monetary policy have created an environment where investors struggle to confidently value assets. Uncertainty about future interest rate decisions makes long-term forecasting extremely difficult.
Adding another layer of complexity, Kevin Warsh’s nomination to lead the Federal Reserve sparked a sharp rally in the U.S. dollar. A stronger dollar makes dollar-denominated assets more expensive for international buyers, further reducing demand for Bitcoin, gold, and silver.
These macro forces were not as prominent when CZ initially proposed the supercycle thesis, which helps explain his change in outlook.
The Scale of Liquidations Exposed Market Fragility
The derivatives market bore the brunt of the recent selloff. Initial liquidations totaled around 850 million dollars, but as prices continued to fall, forced selling snowballed to approximately 2.5 billion dollars.
Nearly 200,000 trader accounts were completely wiped out as their collateral fell below maintenance requirements. This cascade illustrates how overleveraged the crypto market had become.
When exchanges automatically close positions to recover borrowed funds, they add additional selling pressure to an already falling market. This dynamic creates a vicious cycle where lower prices trigger more liquidations, which in turn push prices even lower.
Weekend trading conditions exacerbated the problem. Liquidity is typically thinner during weekends, and institutional participation is reduced. As a result, large sell orders can move prices more dramatically than during normal trading hours.
Data from Kaiko shows that order book liquidity remains more than 30 percent below October levels, leaving the market structurally vulnerable to sudden shocks.
Is the Supercycle Theory Completely Dead
CZ has not entirely abandoned the idea of a supercycle. Instead, he has acknowledged that timing such a development has become nearly impossible.
A true supercycle would imply that Bitcoin enters a prolonged bull market lasting many years without the traditional deep corrections that follow major peaks. For this to occur, Bitcoin would need to achieve a level of institutional adoption and regulatory integration comparable to established financial assets.
While progress is being made on these fronts, the current macro environment is far more hostile than anticipated. Volatility across equities, commodities, and currencies suggests that no asset class is immune to global instability.
CZ’s revised stance reflects a recognition that even strong long-term narratives can be delayed or derailed by external forces.
What Still Supports Bitcoin’s Long-Term Growth
Despite near-term uncertainty, several structural factors continue to support Bitcoin’s long-term outlook.
Corporations are still adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets, signaling confidence in its role as a strategic reserve asset. Institutional investment products, including spot ETFs and custodial services, continue to expand access to Bitcoin for traditional investors.
Regulatory clarity is slowly improving in major jurisdictions. While challenges remain, policymakers are increasingly engaging with the crypto industry rather than attempting to suppress it outright.
Technological innovation within the Bitcoin ecosystem also continues. Advances in scaling solutions, custody infrastructure, and financial products are being developed regardless of short-term price action.
These factors suggest that Bitcoin’s fundamental value proposition remains intact, even if the path forward is more volatile than expected.
How Investors Should Approach the Market Now
CZ’s guidance to investors has shifted toward caution and long-term thinking. Rather than attempting to trade short-term price swings, he encourages a buy-and-hold approach.
This strategy acknowledges that accurately timing market bottoms and tops is extraordinarily difficult, especially in an environment dominated by macro uncertainty.
Long-term accumulation allows investors to benefit from Bitcoin’s potential growth without exposing themselves to the stress and risk of frequent trading.
At the same time, diversification and risk management remain essential. No single asset, including Bitcoin, should represent an outsized portion of an investor’s portfolio.
Whales Accumulating While Retail Capitulates
Onchain data reveals a stark contrast between retail and large holders.
Small holders with fewer than 10 BTC have been net sellers for more than a month, reflecting capitulation as prices fell roughly 35 percent from the recent peak near 126,000 dollars.
Meanwhile, mega-whales holding more than 1,000 BTC have quietly accumulated throughout the downturn. Their holdings have returned to levels last seen in late 2024.
This pattern is common near market bottoms, as large investors with longer time horizons take advantage of fear-driven selling. However, whale accumulation does not guarantee an immediate reversal. It simply suggests that long-term players view current prices as attractive.
The Psychological Battle Between Fear and Conviction
Markets are ultimately driven by human behavior. Fear and greed continue to shape price action just as much as fundamentals.
CZ has warned traders not to react impulsively to every rumor or headline circulating on social media. Emotional decision-making often leads to buying high and selling low, the opposite of a successful investment strategy.
Maintaining discipline during periods of extreme volatility is challenging, but it is also when long-term opportunities are often created.
Changpeng Zhao’s retreat from his earlier supercycle prediction underscores how rapidly market conditions can change. What once seemed like a clear path toward an extended bull market is now clouded by geopolitical tension, macroeconomic instability, and widespread fear.
Rather than offering bold forecasts, CZ now emphasizes patience, risk management, and long-term conviction. While Bitcoin’s structural growth drivers remain intact, the timing and trajectory of future gains are far less certain than many hoped.
For investors, this moment serves as a reminder that even the most compelling narratives must be tested against reality. In an increasingly interconnected global financial system, Bitcoin does not operate in isolation.
The supercycle may still be possible one day. But for now, caution has replaced confidence, and resilience has become the defining trait for those navigating the crypto market.
Bitcoin Supercycle Optimism Faces New Doubts
The idea of Bitcoin entering a prolonged supercycle has been one of the most powerful narratives circulating in the cryptocurrency market over the past year. The concept suggests that Bitcoin could experience an extended multi-year bull run without the traditional deep corrections that have historically defined its price cycles. However, recent comments from former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao have introduced a sharp dose of realism into this optimistic outlook.
Just weeks after expressing strong confidence that Bitcoin was on the verge of breaking free from its four-year cycle pattern, CZ acknowledged that he is no longer certain such a scenario will unfold. Speaking during a weekend AMA session, he explained that intensifying market fear, widespread misinformation, and rising macroeconomic uncertainty have significantly weakened his conviction.
This shift in tone followed a dramatic downturn in Bitcoin’s price, which fell to around 75,000 dollars and triggered massive liquidations across derivatives markets. Nearly 2.5 billion dollars in leveraged positions were wiped out in a short period of time, reinforcing how fragile sentiment has become.
CZ’s reversal does not mean he has abandoned the long-term bullish case for Bitcoin. Instead, it highlights how unpredictable global conditions have become and how difficult it is to confidently forecast extended market behavior, even for seasoned industry leaders.
Why CZ Originally Believed in a Bitcoin Supercycle
Changpeng Zhao’s initial supercycle thesis was rooted in the belief that structural changes were taking place within the global financial system and regulatory landscape. He argued that cryptocurrency, and Bitcoin in particular, was transitioning from a speculative asset class into a recognized component of mainstream finance.
During an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, CZ pointed to increasingly favorable regulatory attitudes in the United States as a key catalyst. He suggested that clearer rules and a more supportive political environment would unlock a wave of institutional capital large enough to fundamentally alter Bitcoin’s historical price behavior.
According to this perspective, once major banks, asset managers, corporations, and sovereign entities feel comfortable allocating capital to Bitcoin, the traditional boom-and-bust cycle tied to halving events could lose relevance. Instead of experiencing sharp peaks followed by multi-year bear markets, Bitcoin might begin to resemble long-term store-of-value assets such as gold.
CZ believed this transformation could culminate around 2026, when regulatory clarity, infrastructure maturity, and institutional participation would converge. At the time, this outlook resonated with many investors who were eager to believe that crypto markets had finally matured beyond their volatile adolescence.
Understanding Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle
To appreciate why the supercycle narrative was so compelling, it is important to understand Bitcoin’s historical four-year cycle. This pattern is closely associated with Bitcoin halving events, which occur approximately every four years and cut the block reward miners receive in half.
These supply reductions have historically acted as powerful catalysts for price appreciation:
The 2012 halving preceded a rally from around 12 dollars to over 1,000 dollars.
The 2016 halving set the stage for Bitcoin’s surge to nearly 20,000 dollars in 2017.
The 2020 halving was followed by the 2021 bull market peak near 69,000 dollars.
Each cycle has followed a similar structure: accumulation, rapid expansion, euphoric peak, and prolonged correction. CZ’s supercycle thesis suggested that this pattern could be broken due to unprecedented institutional demand and regulatory acceptance.
However, breaking such a deeply entrenched historical structure would require extraordinary forces. The recent market downturn has raised questions about whether those forces are truly strong enough to override established dynamics.
What Triggered CZ’s Change in Outlook
The immediate catalyst for CZ’s shift in perspective was Bitcoin’s failure to hold key technical levels. After struggling near 82,500 dollars, the price slid rapidly through multiple support zones.
Bitcoin also fell below its 50-day exponential moving average near 75,500 dollars, a technical signal often associated with extended bearish momentum. More importantly, Bitcoin dipped below its realized price of approximately 80,700 dollars.
The realized price represents the average acquisition cost of all coins currently in circulation. When Bitcoin trades below this level, it implies that a majority of holders are sitting on unrealized losses. Historically, this condition has coincided with periods of heightened fear and capitulation.
Seeing Bitcoin breach these important thresholds while panic spread across social media forced CZ to reconsider his earlier confidence. In his own words, widespread FUD on Crypto Twitter has amplified market anxiety and accelerated selling pressure.
The Selloff Extended Beyond Crypto Markets
One of the most concerning aspects of the recent downturn is that it was not limited to digital assets. Traditional safe havens such as gold and silver also experienced sharp declines.
Gold fell roughly 9 percent to around 4,900 dollars per ounce, while silver plunged by approximately 26 percent to near 85 dollars. Combined losses across precious metals markets were estimated to exceed 10 trillion dollars.
This synchronized selloff across assets that typically behave differently suggests deeper systemic stress rather than a crypto-specific issue. When multiple asset classes decline simultaneously, it often indicates tightening financial conditions, rising liquidity constraints, or shifts in global capital flows.
CZ now attributes the broader market weakness to a combination of geopolitical tensions, macroeconomic instability, and social-media-driven panic.
Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Pressures
Escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly involving the United States and Iran, have driven investors toward the perceived safety of the U.S. dollar. A stronger dollar tends to weigh on risk assets, including stocks, commodities, and cryptocurrencies.
At the same time, persistent inflation and unpredictable monetary policy have created an environment where investors struggle to confidently value assets. Uncertainty about future interest rate decisions makes long-term forecasting extremely difficult.
Adding another layer of complexity, Kevin Warsh’s nomination to lead the Federal Reserve sparked a sharp rally in the U.S. dollar. A stronger dollar makes dollar-denominated assets more expensive for international buyers, further reducing demand for Bitcoin, gold, and silver.
These macro forces were not as prominent when CZ initially proposed the supercycle thesis, which helps explain his change in outlook.
The Scale of Liquidations Exposed Market Fragility
The derivatives market bore the brunt of the recent selloff. Initial liquidations totaled around 850 million dollars, but as prices continued to fall, forced selling snowballed to approximately 2.5 billion dollars.
Nearly 200,000 trader accounts were completely wiped out as their collateral fell below maintenance requirements. This cascade illustrates how overleveraged the crypto market had become.
When exchanges automatically close positions to recover borrowed funds, they add additional selling pressure to an already falling market. This dynamic creates a vicious cycle where lower prices trigger more liquidations, which in turn push prices even lower.
Weekend trading conditions exacerbated the problem. Liquidity is typically thinner during weekends, and institutional participation is reduced. As a result, large sell orders can move prices more dramatically than during normal trading hours.
Data from Kaiko shows that order book liquidity remains more than 30 percent below October levels, leaving the market structurally vulnerable to sudden shocks.
Is the Supercycle Theory Completely Dead
CZ has not entirely abandoned the idea of a supercycle. Instead, he has acknowledged that timing such a development has become nearly impossible.
A true supercycle would imply that Bitcoin enters a prolonged bull market lasting many years without the traditional deep corrections that follow major peaks. For this to occur, Bitcoin would need to achieve a level of institutional adoption and regulatory integration comparable to established financial assets.
While progress is being made on these fronts, the current macro environment is far more hostile than anticipated. Volatility across equities, commodities, and currencies suggests that no asset class is immune to global instability.
CZ’s revised stance reflects a recognition that even strong long-term narratives can be delayed or derailed by external forces.
What Still Supports Bitcoin’s Long-Term Growth
Despite near-term uncertainty, several structural factors continue to support Bitcoin’s long-term outlook.
Corporations are still adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets, signaling confidence in its role as a strategic reserve asset. Institutional investment products, including spot ETFs and custodial services, continue to expand access to Bitcoin for traditional investors.
Regulatory clarity is slowly improving in major jurisdictions. While challenges remain, policymakers are increasingly engaging with the crypto industry rather than attempting to suppress it outright.
Technological innovation within the Bitcoin ecosystem also continues. Advances in scaling solutions, custody infrastructure, and financial products are being developed regardless of short-term price action.
These factors suggest that Bitcoin’s fundamental value proposition remains intact, even if the path forward is more volatile than expected.
How Investors Should Approach the Market Now
CZ’s guidance to investors has shifted toward caution and long-term thinking. Rather than attempting to trade short-term price swings, he encourages a buy-and-hold approach.
This strategy acknowledges that accurately timing market bottoms and tops is extraordinarily difficult, especially in an environment dominated by macro uncertainty.
Long-term accumulation allows investors to benefit from Bitcoin’s potential growth without exposing themselves to the stress and risk of frequent trading.
At the same time, diversification and risk management remain essential. No single asset, including Bitcoin, should represent an outsized portion of an investor’s portfolio.
Whales Accumulating While Retail Capitulates
Onchain data reveals a stark contrast between retail and large holders.
Small holders with fewer than 10 BTC have been net sellers for more than a month, reflecting capitulation as prices fell roughly 35 percent from the recent peak near 126,000 dollars.
Meanwhile, mega-whales holding more than 1,000 BTC have quietly accumulated throughout the downturn. Their holdings have returned to levels last seen in late 2024.
This pattern is common near market bottoms, as large investors with longer time horizons take advantage of fear-driven selling. However, whale accumulation does not guarantee an immediate reversal. It simply suggests that long-term players view current prices as attractive.
The Psychological Battle Between Fear and Conviction
Markets are ultimately driven by human behavior. Fear and greed continue to shape price action just as much as fundamentals.
CZ has warned traders not to react impulsively to every rumor or headline circulating on social media. Emotional decision-making often leads to buying high and selling low, the opposite of a successful investment strategy.
Maintaining discipline during periods of extreme volatility is challenging, but it is also when long-term opportunities are often created.
Changpeng Zhao’s retreat from his earlier supercycle prediction underscores how rapidly market conditions can change. What once seemed like a clear path toward an extended bull market is now clouded by geopolitical tension, macroeconomic instability, and widespread fear.
Rather than offering bold forecasts, CZ now emphasizes patience, risk management, and long-term conviction. While Bitcoin’s structural growth drivers remain intact, the timing and trajectory of future gains are far less certain than many hoped.
For investors, this moment serves as a reminder that even the most compelling narratives must be tested against reality. In an increasingly interconnected global financial system, Bitcoin does not operate in isolation.
The supercycle may still be possible one day. But for now, caution has replaced confidence, and resilience has become the defining trait for those navigating the crypto market.
Share:
HOT News In Crypto
Learning Crypto
You might be interested